|
Spatial Models of Parliamentary Voting
Hardback
Main Details
Title |
Spatial Models of Parliamentary Voting
|
Authors and Contributors |
By (author) Keith T. Poole
|
Series | Analytical Methods for Social Research |
Physical Properties |
Format:Hardback | Pages:248 | Dimensions(mm): Height 235,Width 158 |
|
ISBN/Barcode |
9780521851947
|
Classifications | Dewey:328.375 |
---|
Audience | Professional & Vocational | |
Illustrations |
8 Tables, unspecified; 62 Line drawings, unspecified
|
|
Publishing Details |
Publisher |
Cambridge University Press
|
Imprint |
Cambridge University Press
|
Publication Date |
11 April 2005 |
Publication Country |
United Kingdom
|
Description
This book presents a simple geometric model of voting as a tool to analyze parliamentary roll call data. Each legislator is represented by one point and each roll call is represented by two points that correspond to the policy consequences of voting Yea or Nay. On every roll call each legislator votes for the closer outcome point, at least probabilistically. These points form a spatial map that summarizes the roll calls. In this sense a spatial map is much like a road map because it visually depicts the political world of a legislature. The closeness of two legislators on the map shows how similar their voting records are, and the distribution of legislators shows what the dimensions are. These maps can be used to study a wide variety of topics including how political parties evolve over time, the existence of sophisticated voting and how an executive influences legislative outcomes.
Author Biography
Keith T. Poole is a Professor of Political Science at the University of California, San Diego. He is the author or coauthor of over 40 articles as well as the coauthor of Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting and Income Redistribution and the Realignment of American Politics.
Reviews'This book achieves its aim of explaining how to build a spatial model and will be essential reading for those engaged in that, while still being readable and related well to real politics.' Political Studies Review
|