Constituting Feminist Subjects

Paperback / softback

Main Details

Title Constituting Feminist Subjects
Authors and Contributors      By (author) Kathi Weeks
SeriesFeminist Classics
Physical Properties
Format:Paperback / softback
Pages:208
Dimensions(mm): Height 210,Width 140
Category/GenreDeconstructionism, structuralism and post-structuralism
ISBN/Barcode 9781786636034
ClassificationsDewey:305.4201
Audience
General

Publishing Details

Publisher Verso Books
Imprint Verso Books
Publication Date 14 August 2018
Publication Country United Kingdom

Description

Kathi Weeks suggests that one of the most important tasks for contemporary feminist theory is to develop theories of the subject that are adequate to feminist politics. Although the 1980s modernist-postmodernist debate put the problem of feminist subjectivity on the agenda, Weeks contends that limited debate now blocks the further development of feminist theory. Both modernists and postmodernists succeeded in making clear the problems of an already constituted, essentialist subject. What remains as an ongoing project, Weeks contends, is creating a theory of the constitution of subjects to account for the processes of social construction. This book presents one such account. Drawing on a number of different theoretical frameworks, including feminist standpoint theory, socialist feminism and poststructuralist thought, as well as theories of peformativity and self-valorisation, the author proposes a nonessential feminist subject, a theory of constituting subjects.

Author Biography

Kathi Weeks is Professor in the Program of Gender, Sexuality and Feminist Studies at Duke University. She is the author of The Problem With Work and a co-editor of The Jameson Reader.

Reviews

Kathi Weeks takes a basic insight-modernist and postmodernist thought are notone thing, they are complex fields with multiple and jostling threads runningthrough them-and she proceeds to follow up and disentangle those threads thatare important for feminism. I really loved reading this book. It is bothcritical and appreciative. It is truly written in what I would call a feministspirit. -- Kathy Ferguson, University of Hawaii