The Mentalities of Gorillas and Orangutans: Comparative Perspectives

Paperback / softback

Main Details

Title The Mentalities of Gorillas and Orangutans: Comparative Perspectives
Authors and Contributors      Edited by Sue Taylor Parker
Edited by Robert W. Mitchell
Edited by H. Lyn Miles
Physical Properties
Format:Paperback / softback
Pages:432
Dimensions(mm): Height 233,Width 155
Category/GenrePrimates
ISBN/Barcode 9780521031936
ClassificationsDewey:599.8815
Audience
Professional & Vocational
Illustrations 49 Tables, unspecified; 29 Halftones, unspecified; 30 Line drawings, unspecified

Publishing Details

Publisher Cambridge University Press
Imprint Cambridge University Press
Publication Date 23 November 2006
Publication Country United Kingdom

Description

Research on the mental abilities of chimpanzees and bonobos has been widely celebrated and used in reconstructions of human evolution. In contrast, less attention has been paid to the abilities of gorillas and orangutans. This 1999 volume aims to help complete the picture of hominoid cognition by bringing together the work on gorillas and orangutans and setting it in comparative perspective. The introductory chapters set the evolutionary context for comparing cognition in gorillas and orangutans to that of chimpanzees, bonobos and humans. The remaining chapters focus primarily on the kinds and levels of intelligence displayed by orangutans and gorillas compared to other great apes, including performances in the classic domains of tool use and tool making, imitation, self-awareness, social communication and symbol use. All those wanting more information on the mental abilities of these sometimes neglected, but important primates will find this book a treasure trove.

Reviews

'... this book contains much valuable information on gorillas' and orang-utans' mental life.' Animal Behaviour '... and the present volume will go a long way towards bringing gorillas and orangutans back into the limelight of modern comparative cognition. For that the editors and contributors should be commended.' James R. Anderson, The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology