Christian Contradictions: The Structures of Lutheran and Catholic Thought

Hardback

Main Details

Title Christian Contradictions: The Structures of Lutheran and Catholic Thought
Authors and Contributors      By (author) Daphne Hampson
Physical Properties
Format:Hardback
Pages:336
Dimensions(mm): Height 237,Width 164
Category/GenreChristian theology
ISBN/Barcode 9780521450607
ClassificationsDewey:230.2
Audience
Professional & Vocational
Illustrations 3 Line drawings, unspecified

Publishing Details

Publisher Cambridge University Press
Imprint Cambridge University Press
Publication Date 26 March 2001
Publication Country United Kingdom

Description

Catholic and Lutheran thought are differently structured, embodying divergent conceptions of self and God. Roman/Lutheran ecumenism, culminating in the 1999 "Joint Declaration," attempts to reconcile incompatible systems based on different philosophical presuppositions. Drawing on a wealth of material, the author considers these structural questions within a historical context. Kierkegaard is shown, in a complex model, to hold together strengths which historically have been exemplified by the two traditions. This is an important work in systematic theology which considers questions quite fundamental to Western religion. It should interest theologians of all backgrounds and church historians.

Author Biography

Daphne Hampson is Professor of Divinity at the University of St Andrews, Scotland.

Reviews

'In this well researched and scholarly work, Daphne Hampson argues that Catholicism and Lutheranism are totally incompatible. It is a remarkably generous exposition of both forms of Christianity: not pseudo-neutral but wonderfully sympathetic all round. This is an important book - a radical challenge to decades of ecumenical rapprochement.' Fergus Kerr 'This is a fascinating, original, readable and challenging book. Ecumenists and students of the Reformation should read it, but so should other serious Christians. It is rare for a theological book to be so spiced with passion ... it matters for [Hampson] what people think and what they do with their beliefs.' Mark D. Chapman, The Journal of Theological Studies 'Daphne Hampson traces one of the great fissures in western Christian thought, rejecting all attempts to paper it over, insisting that the most fundamental questions of understanding the self in relation to God are at stake in it. Here is a post-Christian theologian sympathetically engaging with the Lutheran and Catholic traditions, while also defining her own position over against them. This is very interesting reading, and an important book not least because it shows how significant the issues it discusses remain.' Richard Bauckham 'Daphne Hampson shows how different 'structures of thought' affect how Lutheran and Catholic theologies use key theological terms. By analyzing a wide range of materials she argues that these structures become deterrents to ecumenical consensus. In the course of her analysis she examines diverse authors in the Lutheran and Catholic traditions from the sixteenth to the twentieth centuries. Hampson's own position outside Christianity does not impair her theological acumen and empathy, but does provide a critical edge to some of her important judgments.' James M. Gustafson, Emeritus Professor, Emory University 'Particular strengths are the clarity of her exposition, the making available of important material not often covered outside of Roman Catholic contexts (e.g. sixteenth-century material) and her willingness not to step back from the subject-matter of her book.' Clive Marsh, Modern Believing 'Daphne Hampson provides a clear account of the divergent structuring of thought about man in relation to God that emerged at the Reformation, and of the failure of the prevailing Catholic tradition to understand Luther's own starting point ... makes for a compelling read.' Reformation 'In this book Daphne Hampson deploys her formidable intellectual skills in an analysis of the broad divisions between Catholic and Lutheran forms of life and thought ... demonstrating how deeply this disagreement cuts and how much getting to the bottom of it matters.' J. A. DiNoia, editor of The Thomist 'This book is timely.' The Expository Times '... an interesting and challenging book ...' Pacifica