|
Nozick's Libertarian Project: An Elaboration and Defense
Paperback / softback
Main Details
Title |
Nozick's Libertarian Project: An Elaboration and Defense
|
Authors and Contributors |
By (author) Mark D. Friedman
|
Series | Bloomsbury Research in Political Philosophy |
Physical Properties |
Format:Paperback / softback | Pages:224 | Dimensions(mm): Height 234,Width 156 |
|
Category/Genre | Social and political philosophy |
ISBN/Barcode |
9781441102973
|
Classifications | Dewey:320.512 |
---|
Audience | Professional & Vocational | |
|
Publishing Details |
Publisher |
Bloomsbury Publishing Plc
|
Imprint |
Bloomsbury Academic USA
|
Publication Date |
29 October 2012 |
Publication Country |
United States
|
Description
Elaborating on and defending a rigorous, rights-based libertarianism, Mark D. Friedman here develops the seminal ideas articulated by Robert Nozick in his landmark work Anarchy, State and Utopia. Consolidating more than three decades of scholarly and popular writing to have emerged in the wake of Nozick's text, Friedman offers a 21st-century defense of the minimal libertarian state. In the course of this analysis, and drawing on further insights offered by the work of F.A. Hayek, Nozick's Libertarian Project shows that natural rights libertarianism can offer convincing answers to the fundamental questions that lie at the heart of political theory. The book also rebuts many of the most common criticisms to have been levelled at this worldview, including those from left libertarians and from egalitarians such as as G.A. Cohen.
Author Biography
Mark D. Friedman received a J.D. from Georgetown Law School, USA, with honors, and holds an MBA from Columbia University, USA. He is currently an independent scholar working in the field of political theory and ethics.
ReviewsAuthor's interview on Kosmos online is now available as a podcast/ transcript on the Kosmos website: http://www.kosmosonline.org/group-post/podcast-mark-friedman-nozicks-libertarian-project. Nozick's Libertarian Project gives a good overview of many of the arguments in ASU. -- Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews
|