Philosophical Logic

Paperback / softback

Main Details

Title Philosophical Logic
Authors and Contributors      By (author) John P. Burgess
SeriesPrinceton Foundations of Contemporary Philosophy
Physical Properties
Format:Paperback / softback
Pages:168
Dimensions(mm): Height 216,Width 140
Category/GenrePhilosophy - logic
ISBN/Barcode 9780691156330
ClassificationsDewey:160
Audience
Tertiary Education (US: College)
Professional & Vocational

Publishing Details

Publisher Princeton University Press
Imprint Princeton University Press
Publication Date 26 August 2012
Publication Country United States

Description

Philosophical Logic is a clear and concise critical survey of nonclassical logics of philosophical interest written by one of the world's leading authorities on the subject. After giving an overview of classical logic, John Burgess introduces five central branches of nonclassical logic (temporal, modal, conditional, relevantistic, and intuitionisti

Author Biography

John P. Burgess is professor of philosophy at Princeton University. His books include "Fixing Frege" and "Truth", which was cowritten with his son, Alexis G. Burgess.

Reviews

"Burgess has managed to pack an amazing amount of good material into this short monograph, and it can be confidently recommended to any philosopher who wishes to go beyond an introductory logic course and venture into the wilds of philosophical logic. The technical details are of necessity sketchy, but the author provides the reader with helpful lists for further reading at the end of each chapter, as well as a good bibliography. This is an excellent little book, and deserves wide success."--Alasdair Urquhart, Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews "This book is interesting and useful. It enables readers to learn much in a short time... It could be valuable for philosophers working in metaphysics and the philosophy of language who are not logic specialists."--Stephen McLeod, Philosophy in Review "[A] good starting point for exploring philosophical questions about logic, importantly by pondering the reasons for Burgess' sympathies and antipathies."--Paloma Nrez-llzarbe, Mathematical Reviews