The Aporetic Tradition in Ancient Philosophy

Hardback

Main Details

Title The Aporetic Tradition in Ancient Philosophy
Authors and Contributors      Edited by George Karamanolis
Edited by Vasilis Politis
Physical Properties
Format:Hardback
Pages:326
Dimensions(mm): Height 235,Width 157
Category/GenreWestern philosophy - Ancient to c 500
ISBN/Barcode 9781107110151
ClassificationsDewey:180
Audience
Professional & Vocational
Illustrations 1 Line drawings, black and white

Publishing Details

Publisher Cambridge University Press
Imprint Cambridge University Press
Publication Date 28 December 2017
Publication Country United Kingdom

Description

Ancient philosophers from an otherwise diverse range of traditions were connected by their shared use of aporia - translated as puzzlement rooted in conflicts of reasons - as a core tool in philosophical enquiry. The essays in this volume provide the first comprehensive study of aporetic methodology among numerous major figures and influential schools, including the Presocratics, Plato, Aristotle, Plutarch, Alexander of Aphrodisias, Academic sceptics, Pyrrhonian sceptics, Plotinus and Damascius. They explore the differences and similarities in these philosophers' approaches to the source, structure, and aim of aporia, their views on its function and value, and ideas about the proper means of generating such a state among thinkers who were often otherwise opposed in their overall philosophical orientation. Discussing issues of method, dialectic, and knowledge, the volume will appeal to those interested in ancient philosophy and in philosophical enquiry more generally.

Author Biography

George Karamanolis is Associate Professor of Philosophy at the University of Vienna. His publications include Plato and Aristotle in Agreement? Platonists on Aristotle from Antiochus to Porphyry (2006) and The Philosophy of Early Christianity (2013). Vasilis Politis is Associate Professor of Philosophy at Trinity College Dublin. He is the author of The Structure of Enquiry in Plato's Early Dialogues (Cambridge, 2015) as well as of numerous journal articles on philosophical enquiry.

Reviews

'Questions ... are raised and answered in a surprisingly diverse, yet unified series of studies.' Lloyd Gerson, Journal of the History of Philosophy