Charles I and the Aristocracy, 1625-1642

Paperback / softback

Main Details

Title Charles I and the Aristocracy, 1625-1642
Authors and Contributors      By (author) Richard Cust
Physical Properties
Format:Paperback / softback
Pages:368
Dimensions(mm): Height 228,Width 153
Category/GenreBritish and Irish History
ISBN/Barcode 9781316648506
ClassificationsDewey:942.062092
Audience
Professional & Vocational
Illustrations 2 Tables, black and white; 3 Halftones, black and white; 3 Line drawings, black and white

Publishing Details

Publisher Cambridge University Press
Imprint Cambridge University Press
Publication Date 16 March 2017
Publication Country United Kingdom

Description

This is a major study of Charles I's relationship with the English aristocracy. Rejecting the traditional emphasis on the 'Crisis of the Aristocracy', Professor Richard Cust highlights instead the effectiveness of the King and the Earl of Arundel's policies to promote and strengthen the nobility. He reveals how the peers reasserted themselves as the natural leaders of the political nation during the Great Council of Peers in 1640 and the Long Parliament. He also demonstrates how Charles deliberately set out to cultivate his aristocracy as the main bulwark of royal authority, enabling him to go to war against the Scots in 1639 and then build the royalist party which provided the means to fight parliament in 1642. The analysis is framed throughout within a broader study of aristocratic honour and the efforts of the heralds to stabilise the social order.

Author Biography

Richard Cust is Professor of Early Modern History at the University of Birmingham. He is the author of Charles I: A Political Life (2005), and he is a Fellow of the Royal Historical Society.

Reviews

'A work of superb archival research - painstaking and original.' Literary Review 'This powerful new book is a landmark in the historiography of the English Civil War ... Cust's brilliant analysis turns [Laurence] Stone's work on its head. The book is the most formidable contribution to the debate on the origins of the Civil War in years.' Anthony Fletcher, History Today