Understanding the Archaeological Record

Hardback

Main Details

Title Understanding the Archaeological Record
Authors and Contributors      By (author) Gavin Lucas
Physical Properties
Format:Hardback
Pages:320
Dimensions(mm): Height 235,Width 157
Category/GenreArchaeology
ISBN/Barcode 9781107010260
ClassificationsDewey:930.1
Audience
Professional & Vocational
Tertiary Education (US: College)
Illustrations 6 Tables, unspecified; 4 Halftones, unspecified; 17 Line drawings, unspecified

Publishing Details

Publisher Cambridge University Press
Imprint Cambridge University Press
Publication Date 6 February 2012
Publication Country United Kingdom

Description

This book explores the diverse understandings of the archaeological record in both historical and contemporary perspective, while also serving as a guide to reassessing current views. Gavin Lucas argues that archaeological theory has become both too fragmented and disconnected from the particular nature of archaeological evidence. The book examines three ways of understanding the archaeological record - as historical sources, through formation theory and as material culture - then reveals ways to connect these three domains through a reconsideration of archaeological entities and archaeological practice. Ultimately, Lucas calls for a rethinking of the nature of the archaeological record and the kind of history and narratives written from it.

Author Biography

Gavin Lucas is Associate Professor in the Department of Archaeology at the University of Iceland. He is the author of three books, Critical Approaches to Fieldwork, An Archaeology of Colonial Identity and The Archaeology of Time. He is also the editor of several volumes, including Hofstadir: Excavations of a Viking Age Feasting Hall, Archaeologies of the Contemporary Past (with V. Buchli) and Interpreting Archeology (with Alexandra Alexandri et al.).

Reviews

'This is a bold book and worth reading by all theoretically minded scholars.' European Journal of Archaeology 'Lucas's book brings a new complexity to the concept of the archaeological record.' R. Carl DeMuth, Canadian Journal of Archaeology