Soviet Economic Development from Lenin to Khrushchev

Hardback

Main Details

Title Soviet Economic Development from Lenin to Khrushchev
Authors and Contributors      By (author) R. W. Davies
SeriesNew Studies in Economic and Social History
Physical Properties
Format:Hardback
Pages:128
Dimensions(mm): Height 224,Width 143
Category/GenreEconomic history
ISBN/Barcode 9780521622608
ClassificationsDewey:338.947
Audience
Professional & Vocational
Tertiary Education (US: College)
Illustrations 11 Tables, unspecified; 3 Maps

Publishing Details

Publisher Cambridge University Press
Imprint Cambridge University Press
Publication Date 28 March 1998
Publication Country United Kingdom

Description

This book provides a comprehensive survey of Soviet economic development from 1917 to 1965 in the context of the pre-revolutionary economy. In these years the Soviet Union negotiated the first stages of modern industrialisation and then, after the defeat of Nazi Germany and its allies, emerged as one of the two world superpowers. This was also the first attempt to construct a planned socialist order. These developments resulted in great economic achievements at great human cost. Using the results of recent Russian and Western research, Professor Davies discusses the inherent faults and strengths of the system, and pays particular attention to the major controversies. Was the Russian Revolution doomed to failure from the outset? Could the mixed economy of the 1920s have led to a democratic socialist economy? What was the influence of Soviet economic development on the rest of the world?

Reviews

'Books in this series are designed to introduce students to key topics, and to set out the arguments and issues in a 'critical but unpartisan fashion'. R. W. Davies has done this with admirable clarity ... As a teaching tool this book will prove invaluable.' Donal Filtzer, University of East London 'Davies has provided a valuable addition to a distinguished series and one which will earn the gratitude of students of Soviet economic development.' Economic History Review