Ben Jonson and the Politics of Genre

Hardback

Main Details

Title Ben Jonson and the Politics of Genre
Authors and Contributors      Edited by A. D. Cousins
Edited by Alison V. Scott
Physical Properties
Format:Hardback
Pages:232
Dimensions(mm): Height 235,Width 160
Category/GenreLiterary studies - c 1500 to c 1800
Literary studies - plays and playwrights
ISBN/Barcode 9780521513784
ClassificationsDewey:822.3
Audience
Professional & Vocational

Publishing Details

Publisher Cambridge University Press
Imprint Cambridge University Press
Publication Date 19 February 2009
Publication Country United Kingdom

Description

While Ben Jonson's political visions have been well documented, this study was the first to consider how he threaded his views into the various literary genres in which he wrote. For Jonson, these genres were interactive and mutually affirming, necessary for negotiating the tempestuous politics of early modern society, and here some of the most renowned Jonson scholars provide a collection of essays that discuss his use of genre. They present perspectives on many of Jonson's major works, from his epigrams and epistles, through to his Roman tragedies and satirical plays like Volpone. Other topics examined include Jonson's diverse representations of monarchy, his ambiguous celebrations of European commonwealths, his sexual politics, and his engagement with the issues of republicanism. These essays represent the forefront of critical thinking on Ben Jonson, and offer a reassessment of the author's political life in Jacobean and Caroline Britain.

Author Biography

A. D. Cousins is Professor of English at Macquarie University. Alison V. Scott is Lecturer in Renaissance Literature at the University of Queensland.

Reviews

Review of the hardback: 'The editors offer this excellent collection of essays as the first book-length study to explore ways in which Ben Jonson deploys the resources of genre to shape his political vision ... a topic of genre and politics that richly deserves the exploration it receives here.' David Bevington, English Historical Review