A Fig for Fortune by Anthony Copley: A Catholic Response to the Faerie Queene

Hardback

Main Details

Title A Fig for Fortune by Anthony Copley: A Catholic Response to the Faerie Queene
Authors and Contributors      By (author) Susannah Brietz Monta
Edited by Susannah Brietz Monta
SeriesThe Manchester Spenser
Physical Properties
Format:Hardback
Pages:168
Dimensions(mm): Height 234,Width 156
Category/GenreLiterary studies - c 1500 to c 1800
Literary studies - poetry and poets
Roman Catholicism and Roman Catholic churches
ISBN/Barcode 9780719086977
ClassificationsDewey:821.3
Audience
Professional & Vocational
Tertiary Education (US: College)

Publishing Details

Publisher Manchester University Press
Imprint Manchester University Press
Publication Date 7 March 2016
Publication Country United Kingdom

Description

Anthony Copley's A Fig for Fortune was the first major poetic response to Edmund Spenser's The Faerie Queene. Written by a Catholic Englishman with an uneasy relationship to the English regime, A Fig for Fortune offers a deeply contestatory, richly imagined answer to sixteenth-century England's greatest poem. Through its sophisticated response to Spenser, A Fig for Fortune challenges a contemporary literary culture in which Protestant habits of thought and representation were gaining dominance. This book comprises the poem's first scholarly edition. It offers a carefully annotated edition of the 2000-line poem, an overview of English Catholic history in the sixteenth century, a full biography of Anthony Copley, an assessment of his engagement with Spenser's Faerie Queene, and information on the book's early print history. Extensive support for student readers makes it possible to teach Copley's poem alongside The Faerie Queene for the first time. -- .

Author Biography

Susannah Brietz Monta is Glynn Family Honors Associate Professor of English at the University of Notre Dame -- .

Reviews

'One of the volume's many virtues is the glimpse it provides into the complex world of Elizabethan Catholicism.' Claire McEachern, The Spenser Review 47.1 (Winter 2017) -- .