|
Linguistic Turns in Modern Philosophy
Paperback / softback
Main Details
Title |
Linguistic Turns in Modern Philosophy
|
Authors and Contributors |
By (author) Michael Losonsky
|
Series | The Evolution of Modern Philosophy |
Physical Properties |
Format:Paperback / softback | Pages:294 | Dimensions(mm): Height 229,Width 152 |
|
Category/Genre | Philosophy of language |
ISBN/Barcode |
9780521654708
|
Classifications | Dewey:149/.94 149.94 |
---|
Audience | Professional & Vocational | Tertiary Education (US: College) | |
Illustrations |
Worked examples or Exercises
|
|
Publishing Details |
Publisher |
Cambridge University Press
|
Imprint |
Cambridge University Press
|
Publication Date |
16 January 2006 |
Publication Country |
United Kingdom
|
Description
This book traces the linguistic turns in the history of modern philosophy and the development of the philosophy of language from Locke to Wittgenstein. It examines the contributions of canonical figures such as Leibniz, Mill, Frege, Russell, Wittgenstein, Austin, Quine, and Davidson, as well as those of Condillac, Humboldt, Chomsky, and Derrida. Michael Losonsky argues that the philosophy of language begins with Locke's Essay Concerning Human Understanding. He shows how the history of the philosophy of language in the modern period is marked by a dichotomy between formal and pragmatic perspectives on language and that modern philosophy has not been able to integrate these two aspects of human language. Language as a human activity and language as a syntactic and semantic system remain distinct and competing focal points, although the interplay between these points of view has driven the development of the philosophy of language.
Author Biography
Michael Losonsky is professor of philosophy at Colorado State University. He is author of Enlightenment and Action from Descartes to Kant and co-author and co-editor, with H. Geirsson, of Beginning Metaphysics and Readings in Mind and Lanugage.
ReviewsLosonky's timely book is clearly written, engaging and astute. it is well worth careful study and will no doubt provide the emerging field of the history of the philosophy of language with a styrong base for years to come.' Benjamin Hill, British Journal for the History of Philosophy
|