To view prices and purchase online, please login or create an account now.



Interpreting Mach: Critical Essays

Hardback

Main Details

Title Interpreting Mach: Critical Essays
Authors and Contributors      Edited by John Preston
Physical Properties
Format:Hardback
Pages:260
Dimensions(mm): Height 235,Width 158
Category/GenrePhilosophy of the mind
Philosophy of science
History of science
ISBN/Barcode 9781108474016
ClassificationsDewey:193
Audience
Professional & Vocational
Illustrations Worked examples or Exercises

Publishing Details

Publisher Cambridge University Press
Imprint Cambridge University Press
Publication Date 18 March 2021
Publication Country United Kingdom

Description

This volume presents new essays on the work and thought of physicist, psychologist, and philosopher Ernst Mach. Moving away from previous estimations of Mach as a pre-logical positivist, the essays reflect his rehabilitation as a thinker of direct relevance to debates in the contemporary philosophies of natural science, psychology, metaphysics, and mind. Topics covered include Mach's work on acoustical psychophysics and physics; his ideas on analogy and the principle of conservation of energy; the correct interpretation of his scheme of 'elements' and its relationship to his 'historical-critical' method; the relationship of his thought to movements such as American pragmatism, realism, and neutral monism, as well as to contemporary figures such as Friedrich Nietzsche; and the reception and influence of his works in Germany and Austria, particularly by the Vienna Circle.

Author Biography

John Preston is Professor of Philosophy at the University of Reading. He is the author of Feyerabend: Philosophy, Science and Society (1997) and Kuhn's The Structure of Scientific Revolutions: A Reader's Guide (2008). He edited the third volume of Feyerabend's Philosophical Papers and co-edited The Worst Enemy of Science?: Essays in Memory of Paul Feyerabend (with Gonzalo Munevar and David Lamb, 2000).

Reviews

'An important addition to the literature on modern philosophy and the philosophy of science ... Recommended.' J. R. Shook, Choice Magazine