To view prices and purchase online, please login or create an account now.



Colloquial English: Structure and Variation

Paperback / softback

Main Details

Title Colloquial English: Structure and Variation
Authors and Contributors      By (author) Andrew Radford
SeriesCambridge Studies in Linguistics
Physical Properties
Format:Paperback / softback
Pages:344
Dimensions(mm): Height 228,Width 153
Category/GenreUsage and grammar guides
Sociolinguistics
Grammar and syntax
ISBN/Barcode 9781108448697
ClassificationsDewey:418
Audience
Professional & Vocational
Illustrations Worked examples or Exercises

Publishing Details

Publisher Cambridge University Press
Imprint Cambridge University Press
Publication Date 14 June 2018
Publication Country United Kingdom

Description

Drawing on vast amounts of new data from live, unscripted radio and TV broadcasts, and the internet, this is a brilliant and original analysis of colloquial English, revealing unusual and largely unreported types of clause structure. Andrew Radford debunks the myth that colloquial English has a substandard, simplified grammar, and shows that it has a coherent and complex structure of its own. The book develops a theoretically sophisticated account of structure and variation in colloquial English, advancing an area that has been previously investigated from other perspectives, such as corpus linguistics or conversational analysis, but never before in such detail from a formal syntactic viewpoint.

Author Biography

Andrew Radford is Emeritus Professor at the University of Essex. He has written nine books on syntactic theory and English syntax, including Syntactic Theory and the Structure of English (Cambridge, 1997), Minimalist Syntax (Cambridge, 2004) and Analysing English Sentences (Cambridge, 2016).

Reviews

'Lucid, magisterial, encyclopaedic; it covers a huge amount of material and makes sense of horrendously complex data.' Neil Smith, University College London 'Radford demonstrates convincingly that colloquial English is as theoretically interesting and descriptively challenging as standard English. Expressing yourself informally does not exempt you from the constraints of Universal grammar.' Jan Terje Faarlund, University of Oslo