To view prices and purchase online, please login or create an account now.



The Ethics of Armed Humanitarian Intervention

Paperback / softback

Main Details

Title The Ethics of Armed Humanitarian Intervention
Authors and Contributors      Edited by Don E. Scheid
Physical Properties
Format:Paperback / softback
Pages:294
Dimensions(mm): Height 228,Width 151
Category/GenreEthics and moral philosophy
ISBN/Barcode 9781107610675
ClassificationsDewey:172.42
Audience
Professional & Vocational
Illustrations 2 Halftones, unspecified; 2 Halftones, unspecified

Publishing Details

Publisher Cambridge University Press
Imprint Cambridge University Press
Publication Date 24 April 2014
Publication Country United Kingdom

Description

The question of military intervention for humanitarian purposes is a major focus for international law, the United Nations, regional organizations such as NATO, and the foreign policies of nations. Against this background, the 2011 bombing in Libya by Western nations has occasioned renewed interest and concern about armed humanitarian intervention (AHI) and the doctrine of Responsibility to Protect (RtoP). This volume brings together new essays by leading international, philosophical, and political thinkers on the moral and legal issues involved in AHI, and contains both critical and positive views of AHI. Topics include the problem of abuse and needed limitations, the future viability of RtoP and some of its problematic implications, the possibility of AHI providing space for peaceful political protest, and how AHI might be integrated with post-war justice. It is an important collection for those studying political philosophy, international relations, and humanitarian law.

Author Biography

Don E. Scheid is Professor of Philosophy, Emeritus, at Winona State University. He is co-editor (with Deen K. Chatterjee) of the anthology Ethics and Foreign Intervention (Cambridge University Press, 2003).

Reviews

'... a useful collection of insightful perspectives and important contributions to AHI debates.' Amanda Cawston, The Philosophical Quarterly