To view prices and purchase online, please login or create an account now.



Descartes on Forms and Mechanisms

Paperback / softback

Main Details

Title Descartes on Forms and Mechanisms
Authors and Contributors      By (author) Helen Hattab
Physical Properties
Format:Paperback / softback
Pages:248
Dimensions(mm): Height 229,Width 152
Category/GenreHistory of Western philosophy
Western philosophy - c 1600 to c 1900
ISBN/Barcode 9781107405158
ClassificationsDewey:111.092 194
Audience
Professional & Vocational
Illustrations Worked examples or Exercises

Publishing Details

Publisher Cambridge University Press
Imprint Cambridge University Press
Publication Date 19 July 2012
Publication Country United Kingdom

Description

The modern view of causation can be traced back to the mechanistic science of Descartes, whose rejection of Aristotelian physics, with its concept of substantial forms, in favor of mechanical explanations was a turning-point in the history of philosophy. However the reasoning which led Descartes and other early moderns in this direction is not well understood. This book traces Descartes' groundbreaking theory of scientific explanation back to the mathematical demonstrations of Aristotelian mechanics and interprets these advances in light of the available arguments for and against substantial forms. It also examines how Descartes' new theory led him to develop a metaphysical foundation for his science that could avoid skeptical objections. It will appeal to a wide range of readers interested in the philosophy and science of the early modern period.

Reviews

'This is a subtle and learned book, and sheds light on a narrow but, Hattab argues, central slice of the debates around substantial forms in the early seventeenth century and the rise of the mechanical philosophy. Hattab provides important context for Descartes's arguments against Scholastic forms and adds detail to our understanding of both the object and motivation of his attack. She offers a stimulating reading not only of Descartes's relationship to contemporary Scholasticism, but also of his scientific method and metaphysical commitments at various stages in his career.' Journal of the History of Philosophy