To view prices and purchase online, please login or create an account now.



The Ethics of the Family in Seneca

Hardback

Main Details

Title The Ethics of the Family in Seneca
Authors and Contributors      By (author) Liz Gloyn
Physical Properties
Format:Hardback
Pages:258
Dimensions(mm): Height 235,Width 158
Category/GenrePhilosophy
Western philosophy - Ancient to c 500
Ethics and moral philosophy
ISBN/Barcode 9781107145474
ClassificationsDewey:173 173.092
Audience
Professional & Vocational
Illustrations 1 Line drawings, black and white

Publishing Details

Publisher Cambridge University Press
Imprint Cambridge University Press
Publication Date 15 February 2017
Publication Country United Kingdom

Description

This book is the first extensive study of the role of the family in the work of Seneca. It offers a new way of reading philosophy that combines philosophical analysis with social, cultural and historical factors to bring out the ways in which Stoicism presents itself as in tune with the universe. The family serves a central role in an individual's moral development - both the family as conventionally understood, and the wider conceptual family which Stoicism constructs. Innovative readings of Seneca's work bring out the importance of the family to his thought and how it interacts with other Stoic doctrines. We learn how to be virtuous from observing and imitating our family, who can be biological relatives or people we choose as our intellectual ancestors. The Ethics of the Family in Seneca will be of particular interest to researchers in Roman Stoicism, imperial culture and the history of the family.

Author Biography

Liz Gloyn is Lecturer in Classics at Royal Holloway, University of London. As well as Latin literature and Roman philosophy, her research interests also include the history of women as professional classicists and the role of classical monsters in modern popular culture.

Reviews

'This is a significant achievement and will be warmly appreciated by students of Seneca's thought and of Roman social history alike.' Brad Inwood, Bryn Mawr Classical Review