|
The Prisoner's Dilemma
Hardback
Main Details
Title |
The Prisoner's Dilemma
|
Authors and Contributors |
Edited by Martin Peterson
|
Series | Classic Philosophical Arguments |
Physical Properties |
Format:Hardback | Pages:306 | Dimensions(mm): Height 253,Width 179 |
|
Category/Genre | Philosophy of science |
ISBN/Barcode |
9781107044357
|
Classifications | Dewey:519.3 |
---|
Audience | Professional & Vocational | Tertiary Education (US: College) | |
Illustrations |
7 Tables, black and white; 42 Line drawings, unspecified
|
|
Publishing Details |
Publisher |
Cambridge University Press
|
Imprint |
Cambridge University Press
|
Publication Date |
2 July 2015 |
Publication Country |
United Kingdom
|
Description
The Prisoner's Dilemma is one of the most fiercely debated thought experiments in philosophy and the social sciences, presenting the simple insight that when two or more agents interact, the actions that most benefit each individual may not benefit the group. The fact that when you do what is best for you, and I do what is best for me, we end up in a situation that is worse for both of us makes the Prisoner's Dilemma relevant to a broad range of everyday phenomena. This volume of new essays from leading philosophers, game theorists, and economists examines the ramifications of the Prisoner's Dilemma, the directions in which it continues to lead us, and its links to a variety of topics in philosophy, political science, social science, economics, and evolutionary biology. The volume will be a vital and accessible resource for upper-level students as well as for academic researchers.
Author Biography
Martin Peterson is Sue and Harry E. Bovay Professor in the Department of Philosophy at Texas A & M University. His recent publications include Non-Bayesian Decision Theory (2008), An Introduction to Decision Theory (Cambridge, 2009) and The Dimensions of Consequentialism (Cambridge, 2013).
Reviews'... the book provides a good overview of the variety of perspectives on the rational solutions to the Prisoner's dilemma, as well as of the increasing doubts regarding its descriptive and explanatory scope.' Cedric Paternotte, Metascience
|