To view prices and purchase online, please login or create an account now.



Sensation, Contemporary Poetry and Deleuze: Transformative Intensities

Hardback

Main Details

Title Sensation, Contemporary Poetry and Deleuze: Transformative Intensities
Authors and Contributors      By (author) Dr Jon Clay
SeriesContinuum Literary Studies
Physical Properties
Format:Hardback
Pages:224
Dimensions(mm): Height 234,Width 156
Category/GenreLiterary theory
Literary studies - from c 1900 -
Literary studies - poetry and poets
ISBN/Barcode 9780826424242
ClassificationsDewey:808.1
Audience
Professional & Vocational

Publishing Details

Publisher Continuum Publishing Corporation
Imprint Continuum Publishing Corporation
Publication Date 5 August 2010
Publication Country United States

Description

Focussing on the significance of sensation, this study develops a Deleuzian poetics of reading, through an examination of contemporary innovative poetry. It suggests that a Deleuzian way of reading offers a firm purchase on notoriously difficult texts, providing concepts and a language that aids their understanding.

Author Biography

Jon Clay is Lecturer in English at Richmond-Upon-Thames College. He is a practising poet.

Reviews

"With wonderfully patient intelligence, and without ever succumbing to polemic, Jon Clay puts to work the lexicon of Deleuze (and Guattari) on a question that has haunted modernist poetics: what is it that poems do when you read them, especially when they are "difficult"? Very carefully, he sets out the terms and, just as carefully, he demonstrates their practicality through reading poems, many of them "recalcitrant", by contemporary UK-based poets, including Andrea Brady, the late Douglas Oliver, J.H. Prynne and Denise Riley. His close readings confirm the validity both of the method - one that is necessarily self-unsettling - and of the poems thus encountered. This book is a very welcome contribution to the poetics and pragmatics of reading. It shows how it is possible to say what it is that poems do and how this is not the same as saying what they (seem to) say, all the while arguing that another('s) reading would be a different reading and thus call, perhaps, for another writing." -- John Hall, Associate Director of Research, University College Falmouth (Dartington), UK