To view prices and purchase online, please login or create an account now.



Housewives and Citizens: Domesticity and the Women's Movement in England, 1928-64

Paperback / softback

Main Details

Title Housewives and Citizens: Domesticity and the Women's Movement in England, 1928-64
Authors and Contributors      By (author) Caitriona Beaumont
SeriesGender in History
Physical Properties
Format:Paperback / softback
Pages:256
Dimensions(mm): Height 216,Width 138
Category/GenreBritish and Irish History
ISBN/Barcode 9780719097256
ClassificationsDewey:305.40941
Audience
Professional & Vocational

Publishing Details

Publisher Manchester University Press
Imprint Manchester University Press
Publication Date 1 March 2015
Publication Country United Kingdom

Description

After an extremely successful debut in hardback, Housewives and citizens is now available in paperback for the first time. This book explores the contribution that five conservative, voluntary and popular women's organisations made to women's lives and to the campaign for women's rights throughout the period 1928-64. The book challenges existing histories of the women's movement that suggest the movement went into decline during the inter-war period, only to be revived by the emergence of the Women's Liberation Movement in the late 1960s. It is argued that the term 'women's movement' must be revised to allow a broader understanding of female agency encompassing feminist, political, religious and conservative women's groups who campaigned to improve the status of women throughout the twentieth century. The book provides a radical re-assessment of this period of women's history and in doing so makes a significant contribution to ongoing debates about the shape and impact of the women's movement in twentieth-century Britain. -- .

Author Biography

Caitriona Beaumont is Principal Lecturer in Social History at London South Bank University -- .

Reviews

'Housewives and Citizens offers a refreshing perspective on women's activism in 20th century England, enlarging - and challenging - our study of the past. It is a timely reminder that women who did not identify with feminism were nonetheless active in campaigning for improvements in women's lot.' June Purvis, Times Higher Education, 21 November 2013 -- .