|
Mark, Manuscripts, and Monotheism: Essays in Honor of Larry W. Hurtado
Paperback / softback
Main Details
Title |
Mark, Manuscripts, and Monotheism: Essays in Honor of Larry W. Hurtado
|
Authors and Contributors |
Edited by Dr Dieter Roth
|
|
Edited by Chris Keith
|
Series | The Library of New Testament Studies |
Physical Properties |
Format:Paperback / softback | Pages:304 | Dimensions(mm): Height 234,Width 156 |
|
Category/Genre | Christian theology |
ISBN/Barcode |
9780567669193
|
Classifications | Dewey:226.306 |
---|
Audience | Professional & Vocational | |
|
Publishing Details |
Publisher |
Bloomsbury Publishing PLC
|
Imprint |
T.& T.Clark Ltd
|
Publication Date |
19 May 2016 |
Publication Country |
United Kingdom
|
Description
Mark, Manuscripts, and Monotheism is organized into three parts: Mark's Gospel, Manuscripts and Textual Criticism, and Monotheism and Early Jesus-Devotion. With contributors hailing from several different countries, and including both senior and junior scholars, this volume contains essays penned in honor of Larry W. Hurtado by engaging and focusing upon these three major emphases in his scholarship. The result is not only a fitting tribute to one of the most influential New Testament scholars of present times, but also a welcome survey of current scholarship.
Author Biography
Chris Keith is Professor of New Testament and Early Christianity and Director of the Centre for the Social-Scientific Study of the Bible at St. Mary's University College, Twickenham, UK. Dieter T. Roth is Wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter (Post-Doctoral Fellow) at Johannes Gutenberg-Universitat Mainz, Germany.
ReviewsA fitting tribute to a fine scholar of Early Christianity, in whose debt many of us are. * Journal for the Study of the New Testament * It is a delight to see in this volume not only senior scholar-friends of Hurtado honor him, but also many of his doctoral students. I warmly recommend this work to researchers interested in Hurtado's work or in 'Mark, manuscripts, and monotheism' in general. * Religious Studies Review *
|