|
International Law, the International Court of Justice and Nuclear Weapons
Paperback / softback
Main Details
Title |
International Law, the International Court of Justice and Nuclear Weapons
|
Authors and Contributors |
Edited by Laurence Boisson de Chazournes
|
|
Edited by Philippe Sands
|
Physical Properties |
Format:Paperback / softback | Pages:620 | Dimensions(mm): Height 228,Width 154 |
|
ISBN/Barcode |
9780521654807
|
Classifications | Dewey:341.734 |
---|
Audience | Professional & Vocational | |
Illustrations |
Worked examples or Exercises
|
|
Publishing Details |
Publisher |
Cambridge University Press
|
Imprint |
Cambridge University Press
|
Publication Date |
26 August 1999 |
Publication Country |
United Kingdom
|
Description
The legality of nuclear weapons has been strongly questioned in recent years, particularly by the developing countries and non-governmental organisations. Their concern found expression in the requests by the World Health Organisation and the United Nations General Assembly to the International Court of Justice to pronounce on the legality of their use. On 8 July 1996, the Court handed down two Advisory Opinions; these are the first authoritative international judicial opinions since the development of nuclear weapons in the 1940s. This book offers a comprehensive study of the opinions. More than thirty internationally respected experts contribute their analyses of the status of nuclear weapons in international law across all its sectors: use of force, humanitarian law, environment and human rights. The contributions also assess the implications of the opinions for international organisations and the international judicial function. Contributors include lawyers, academics, diplomats and advisors to international bodies.
Reviews'... for persons seeking a thorough-going, high-quality, readable analysis of all aspects of this important development in international law, this is the book to have. It is probably more suitable for professional international lawyers and students of the subject.' The Law Quarterly Review
|