To view prices and purchase online, please login or create an account now.



Wollstonecraft: A Vindication of the Rights of Men and a Vindication of the Rights of Woman and Hints

Hardback

Main Details

Title Wollstonecraft: A Vindication of the Rights of Men and a Vindication of the Rights of Woman and Hints
Authors and Contributors      By (author) Mary Wollstonecraft
Edited by Sylvana Tomaselli
SeriesCambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought
Physical Properties
Format:Hardback
Pages:394
Dimensions(mm): Height 216,Width 140
ISBN/Barcode 9780521430531
ClassificationsDewey:305.32
Audience
Tertiary Education (US: College)
Professional & Vocational
Illustrations Worked examples or Exercises

Publishing Details

Publisher Cambridge University Press
Imprint Cambridge University Press
Publication Date 6 July 1995
Publication Country United Kingdom

Description

Mary Wollstonecraft, often described as the first major feminist, is remembered principally as the author of A Vindication of the Rights of Woman (1792), and there has been a tendency to view her most famous work in isolation. Yet Wollstonecraft's pronouncements about women grew out of her reflections about men, and her views on the female sex constituted an integral part of a wider moral and political critique of her times which she first fully formulated in A Vindication of the Rights of Men (1790). Written as a reply to Edmund Burke's Reflections on the Revolution in France (1790), this is an important text in its own right as well as a necessary tool for understanding Wollstonecraft's later work. This edition brings the two texts together and also includes Hints, the notes which Wollstonecraft made towards a second, never completed, volume of A Vindication of the Rights of Woman.

Reviews

'... a thoughtful, wide-ranging and important examination of Wollstonecraft's thought ... Wollstonecraft is skilfully considered in terms of radical Enlightenment thought, and the links between this and feminism are probed in a treatment that is alive to the diversity of this radicalism.' Times Higher Education Supplement