To view prices and purchase online, please login or create an account now.



Baxter: A Holy Commonwealth

Paperback / softback

Main Details

Title Baxter: A Holy Commonwealth
Authors and Contributors      By (author) Richard Baxter
Edited by William Lamont
SeriesCambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought
Physical Properties
Format:Paperback / softback
Pages:292
Dimensions(mm): Height 215,Width 137
Category/GenreBritish and Irish History
World history - c 1500 to c 1750
ISBN/Barcode 9780521405805
ClassificationsDewey:941.06
Audience
Tertiary Education (US: College)
Professional & Vocational
Illustrations Worked examples or Exercises

Publishing Details

Publisher Cambridge University Press
Imprint Cambridge University Press
Publication Date 28 April 1994
Publication Country United Kingdom

Description

A Holy Commonwealth was written in 1659 by the Puritan minister Richard Baxter (1615-91), and proved to be the most controversial of all his works. He publicly repudiated it in 1670, and in 1683 the Oxford University authorities ordered it to be part of a book-burning that included the works of Hobbes and Milton. The scandal that surrounded it has obscured its merits as the most candid of confessions as to why a conservative Puritan fought for Parliament in the Civil War and gave his support to the Cromwells. The views it expresses are at variance with the cautious explanations given in Baxter's later memoirs (now seen as a less reliable source than past commentators have presumed). This edition of A Holy Commonwealth makes available to modern readers a work which offers a unique perspective on the relation between church and magistrate and the origins of the English Civil War.

Reviews

"Lamont's edition of 'A Holy Commonwealth' judiciously extracts the substance of the full work, including, for the first time in a modern edition, all of the three hundred eighty theses as well as those explanatory comments which contain new material...For the first time, students have access to the full range of Baxter's arguments without having to wade through the original, parts of which are redundant. The result is brilliant." Richard Greaves, Church History