|
On Cloning
Paperback
Main Details
Title |
On Cloning
|
Authors and Contributors |
By (author) John Harris
|
Series | Thinking in Action |
Physical Properties |
Format:Paperback | Pages:200 | Dimensions(mm): Height 198,Width 129 |
|
ISBN/Barcode |
9780415317009
|
Classifications | Dewey:176 |
---|
Audience | General | Professional & Vocational | |
|
Publishing Details |
Publisher |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
|
Imprint |
Routledge
|
Publication Date |
16 June 2004 |
Publication Country |
United Kingdom
|
Description
Cloning: few words have as much potential to grip our imagination or grab the headlines. No longer the stuff of science fiction or Star Wars - it is happening now. Yet human cloning is currently banned throughout the world, and therapeutic cloning banned in many countries. In this highly controversial book, John Harris does a lot more than ask why we are so afraid of cloning. He presents a deft and informed defence of human cloning, carefully exposing the rhetorical and highly dubious arguments against it. He begins with a welcome introduction to what a human clone is, before tackling some of the most common and frequently bizarre criticisms of cloning: Is it really wicked? Can we regulate it? What about the welfare of cloned children? Does it turn human beings into commodities? Dismissing one by one some of the myths about human cloning, in particular that it is degrading and unsafe, he astutely argues that some of our most cherished values, such as the freedom to start a family and the freedom from state control, actually support the case for human cloning. Offering a brave and lucid insight into this ethical minefield, John Harris at last shows that far from ending the diversity of human life or creating a race of super-clones, cloning has the power to improve and heal human life.
Reviews'This much-needed book constitutes a magisterial demolition of woolly headed objections to cloning...With the rigorous applications of cold, hard logic Harris dismantles every objection that has been raised in the process...' - Steven Poole, The Guardian 'His arguments are lucid and irrefutable.' - Laurence Phelan, The Independent
|